| Welcome |
|
|
.
Welcome to the Alaska Home Inspectors Forum.
You are currently viewing our discussion boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.
By logging in as a registered member, you will have access to post topics, be able to communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access other special features.
Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, if you have not already done so, Register to join our community today!
Then Log in and become an active member. |
 |  | | Space being called habitable, but under 70 sq/ft?? |
|  |
Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 8:17 pm |
|
|
| Patrick Hartshorn |
| Home Inspector |
|
 |
| Joined: 28 Jan 2008 |
| Posts: 29 |
| Location: Wasilla |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
Ok, here is something that came up at an inspection and I do not know who is the one that would call attention to this, me or someone like maybe an appraiser???
The place is advertised as 4 bedroom, but one of the rooms being called a bedroom is 7 foot by 8 foot. This calculates to 56 square feet. It does have a small closet and legal egress. The buyer called attention to it trying to get me to say it is not a bedroom, he is probably trying to knock the price down a little.
Do you think it is my job to call attention to this or is it someone elses, what would you guys do???
I would not want to be the one who gets sued at a future time for not saying something now and the new owner perhaps is selling at a future date and gets nailed on the number of rooms.
I do not know the septic size since there is no papers on this one, it is a foreclosure.
The code book (IRC 2003) sais that there must be a minimul room of 120 sq/ft to define the place as a dwelling and then no other "habitable rooms" shall be less than 70 sq/ft with no less than 7 feet in any one horizontal distance.
I would assume this means all rooms under 70 sq/ft are closets, storage, bathrooms, etc..
I would appreciate any facts or opinions on this one.
Thanks
Patrick Hartshorn |
|
_________________ "Advance Look Building Inspections" and "Environmental Safeguard Professionals" are owned and operated in Alaska by Patrick and Mamie Hartshorn. We are a division of Environmental Service Professionals (ESP) www.espusa.net.
|
|
|
|
|
Posted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 10:21 am |
|
|
| Patrick Hartshorn |
| Home Inspector |
|
 |
| Joined: 28 Jan 2008 |
| Posts: 29 |
| Location: Wasilla |
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
I am not sure how to answer your question and will leave that up to the more seasoned inspectors.
As far as my company, I was trained to inspect existing homes based on "Industry standards" and/or local health or safety regulations. I have always been told that we do not have "codes" in Alaska per say, unless they are adopted by a particular area (Anchorage for example).
The other side to this is that "industry standards" are codes! We are just using the code books as a backing so we can point issues out that are considered incorrect, unsafe or unhealthy within the industry. It all comes down to the fact that the industry is driven originally by codes.
The new home inspector that inspected my house in Wasilla wrote up many issues to my builder and cited "codes" as a backing. My buildier basically said "thats nice, but there are no adopted codes in Alaska for these issues", and continued on with things his own way. The idea of the home inspection was great, however the inspector had no authority and the builder had no care! My house is 2.5 years old and there still are issues unresolved with the builder concerning the home inspection. Our existing home inspections are basically the same, they don't have to comply with any of it, it is up to them and the others involved with the report or transaction to decide what to deal with or not deal with.
Per my original question, I am now confident that we are responsible to point out the room size if it appears or there is proof that it is being used as a "habitable" room. The home in question was being sold as a 4 bedroom, and there were really only 3. I now feel that if I did not point this out and a future issue arose, they would come back on me as well as anyone else involved for blame, I have some of my insurance because it is the law and some because it is a good idea, not because I want to use any of it!
Pat. |
|
_________________ "Advance Look Building Inspections" and "Environmental Safeguard Professionals" are owned and operated in Alaska by Patrick and Mamie Hartshorn. We are a division of Environmental Service Professionals (ESP) www.espusa.net.
|
|
|
|